Hypothesis Toward the Unification of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics: The Space Bit Density Proposition

 

Hypothesis Toward the Unification of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics: The Space Bit Density Proposition

In the quest to reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics – two pillars of modern physics – I propose a concept that aligns with observational evidence from both realms. This proposition, which I term 'space bit density', is rooted in our understanding of space-time as described by Einstein's theory of general relativity and the granular structure of space as postulated by theories of quantum gravity.

          Unifying these two theories – one governing the largest celestial bodies and the other, the tiniest particles – is a crucial endeavor in physics. It not only holds the promise to resolve inconsistencies between the two theories but also opens doors to unexplored realms of knowledge and possibilities, including understanding the very birth of our universe and the nature of time itself.

Einstein's general relativity postulates that gravity manifests as a curvature of space-time, challenging the notion of gravity as a fixed feature of reality. However, it has been criticized for failing to merge seamlessly with quantum mechanical observations and for yielding infinities in the face of black holes – phenomena where, according to Einstein's formulas, time can infinitely warp space-time.

On the quantum scale, theories of quantum gravity posit that space is quantized, that is, it can be broken down into discrete, indivisible units roughly the size of the Planck length. While this model aligns with the quantum mechanical understanding of nature as fundamentally granular, it also falters in providing a comprehensive understanding of gravity, primarily due to the lack of empirical knowledge about how these 'grains of space', or 'spacebits', behave. This has led to a myriad of mathematical interpretations, many of which have reached dead ends.

In light of these challenges, the 'space bit density' proposition provides a promising avenue for exploration. The subsequent sections will delve into the specifics of this proposition, exploring its potential implications and how it might hold the key to unifying these currently disparate theories.

The proposition asserts that all matter and energy present in space exert influence on the smallest quantum units of space, referred to as 'spacebits,' causing them to move away from their centers of mass. This dynamic results in a change in the spacebit density, . Specifically, as the mass of an object increases, the density of spacebits decreases, hence forcing matter to be constrain into a lower amount of space. This process continues until reaching a point where a singularity becomes possible, thereby offering a resolution to the theoretical impossibility of an infinite bending of space, and loss of information in the case of black holes. The following sections provide a comprehensive illustration of this proposition.

 

In this previous illustration the different shades of gray, represent the sbit density, black being space at its standard density in the absence of mass and white being the singularity in which all mass is crunch into 1 sbit point. All the intermediate gray would represent the diminishing sbit density as the center of mass is approach.

 

As we aim to reconcile the theories of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, we propose an innovative hypothesis that employs the notion of 'spacebit density'. We define the baseline density as 1 meter divided by Planck length, yielding a spacebit density of approximately 6.187 x 10^34 spacebits per meter in the absence of matter/energy. Our principal endeavor lies in deriving a formula that correlates the spacebit density with both the mass of an object and its relative distance/radius. To accomplish this, we adopted an adapted form of the gravitational time dilation equation. This formula is expressed as:

 

Sbit density = ((1/planck) -1) * square root((1 - (2 * G * mass / (distance * speed_of_light^2)))) + 1

 

The equation introduced here uses a set of familiar physical constants. The Planck constant is invoked to represent the quantization of action in the realm of quantum mechanics, while 'G' represents the gravitational constant in Einstein's field equations. The variables 'mass', 'distance', and 'speed_of_light' denote mass of the object, distance from the center of mass, and speed of light respectively. Their interplay in this equation signifies their mutual influence on spacebit density.

This formula aspires to integrate key aspects from both Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity into a unified theoretical framework. However, the application and validity of this formula necessitate meticulous validation through rigorous calculations and potentially experimental testing. I further propose a novel interpretation of the phenomenon of time dilation. In the traditional understanding of physics, time dilation arises due to the curvature of spacetime as outlined in General Relativity. In contrast, our theory conjectures that changes in the density of spacebits impact the speed of information transfer, thereby causing time dilation. This hypothesis introduces an innovative viewpoint but mandates rigorous substantiation through mathematical analysis and empirical evidence.

Addressing the phenomenon of time dilation, which is empirically confirmed, my perspective contends that time is intrinsically related to space. All entities exhibit motion relative to other entities and to space itself. We posit that an event's existence or reality is contingent upon the knowledge of its occurrence, which is facilitated through the conversion of the event's information encoded into spacebits via its interaction, thereby making it perceptible to all forms of matter, sentient or otherwise.

As I challenge the conventional notion of spacetime curvature, I offer an alternative explanation for time dilation. My hypothesis posits that changes in spacebit density can cause time dilation for certain observers by influencing the rate at which information pertaining to events is relayed between reference points. As I will elucidate later, all interactions between matter and spacebits occur at the speed of light.

Each spacebit, under our framework, communicates at an estimated rate of 1 bit per Planck time (5.391247 × 10^-44 seconds) per spacebit. This encapsulates the idea that even at the most fundamental level, the transfer of information or communication is tethered to the structure of space and time. However, these concepts will require further refinement and empirical validation to ascertain their accuracy. Illustration below for reference:

This illustration shows a hypothetical model of 2d rendering of what a varying density space would look like.  An object moving at “x” sbits per second through space of homogenous density would hypothetically move in a straight line but if it were to enter the domain of a celestial body influencing the density of sbits a velocity of “x” sbits per second would cause the object to shift its direction or enter the orbit of the celestial body. 

 

In this proposed framework, any bit of information or event occurring closer to the center of a gravitational field will take longer to be transmitted. This delay is due to the increased iterations required for all information to be transferred through each spacebit, which is a consequence of the lower spacebit density near the center of mass.

Contrastingly, when information is relayed from a point further away from the center of mass, where the spacebit density is higher, the information undergoes fewer iterations. Consequently, it gets relayed more quickly. See previous graph.

This phenomenon, in effect, leads to a perceived time discrepancy between two observers situated at different points with distinct spacebit densities. The greater the disparity in spacebit density, owing to the varying distance from the center of the gravitational field, the more significant the perceived time discrepancy or dilation.

Here, it's crucial to note that this time discrepancy is primarily a function of the differential ratio of iterations, rather than just the sheer quantity of iterations between the two points.

In essence, when the quantity of necessary iterations for information sharing is equal for two observers, and their speeds are constant, they perceive time in the same way. However, the graph below demonstrates that as the rate of spacebit density change increases, particularly near an event horizon or any influential massive object, time dilation becomes significantly pronounced.

In the following graph below I intend to illustrate how time dilation between two observers grows as the disparity sbit densities is more pronounce.

In our understanding of black holes, or singularities, we encounter the most extreme disparity in spacebit density. This vast discrepancy has profound implications for the perceived exchange of information. In essence, it is not that information vanishes once it crosses the event horizon of a black hole; rather, the process of information exchange becomes so heavily skewed that it appears as though information is being lost.

In reality, a black hole takes in massive amounts of information (akin to light or mass), but the information it releases in return is spread out across a time span so extensive it might as well be infinite. From our vantage point, it appears as though no information escapes the black hole.

To illustrate this point, consider a thought experiment: Imagine connecting your computer to a television to watch a movie. However, the TV displays the movie at an incredibly slow pace—one pixel at a time, each second. Despite the constant display of pixels, you perceive the screen as nearly black because the 'information' (the movie) is being relayed so slowly. From this perspective, it appears as if the movie isn't playing at all, although it is. The only way to properly perceive the movie would be to dramatically increase the playback speed.

This scenario parallels the predicament of information exchange with a black hole. The immense disparity in spacebit densities at the event horizon means the transfer of information is so slow that it appears nonexistent from an outside perspective. It's not that the 'movie' isn't playing; we simply can't perceive it given our limited frame of reference.

We propose an innovative hypothesis that challenges conventional understandings of time dilation, asserting that all time is fundamentally tied to space. Every entity exists in motion relative to other entities and to space itself. We contend that the reality of an event hinges on the information about it being shared into spacebits through interactions, making the event known to all other entities, whether they are conscious or not.

In our framework, changes in spacebit density influence the rate at which information is shared between reference points, and hence, affect the perception of time for certain observers. All matter interacts with spacebits at the speed of light, with each spacebit transmitting information at an estimated rate of 1 bit per Planck time (5.391247 × 10^-44 seconds) per spacebit.

My hypothesis addresses time dilation - a well-established phenomenon - through a novel lens: variations in spacebit density. We suggest that spacebit density is influenced by both the mass of an object and its relative velocity, leading to changes in perceived time.

The crux of the hypothesis is rooted in the way spacebits communicate. Each spacebit can transmit information at a rate of 1 bit per Planck time per sbit. I propose this fundamental concept helps explain why time appears to dilate in certain scenarios.

Consider an area close to the center of a mass. Here, the spacebit density is lower. If we have a piece of information, let's say "a", that needs to be transmitted to this region from an area of higher spacebit density, "a" will be divided into smaller parts (a1, a2, a3...). Each part can be transmitted by a separate sbit simultaneously, reaching the region near the center of mass in just 1 unit of Planck time. This results in faster information transmission and thus, time seems to move quicker.

On the other hand, if we are trying to send information "a" from a region of low spacebit density (near the center of mass) to a region of higher spacebit density (farther away from the center), "a" needs to be transmitted bit by bit, requiring multiple iterations. This makes the transmission slower, making time appear to move slower.

So, the experience of time dilation between two points is not about the sheer quantity of iterations required for information sharing, but about the ratio between the number of iterations needed at each point. If the ratio remains consistent, and the observers are at the same relative speeds, they'll perceive time equally.

Our hypothesis also offers a perspective on phenomena such as black holes. At the event horizon of a black hole, the spacebit density is exceptionally low. As a result, information seems to 'disappear' within it. But, according to our hypothesis, the information isn't lost. It's simply being transmitted at a much slower pace due to the low spacebit density, making it seem as if it's being spread across an almost infinite span of time.

To substantiate this theory, we suggest a correlation between the changes in spacebit density due to mass and speed and the formulas for gravitational and speed-induced time dilation:

For gravity-induced changes: Sbit density = ((((1/planck))-1) * (sqrt((1 - (2 * G * mass / (distance * speed_of_light^2)))))+1

For speed-perceive changes: Sbit density = (((1/planck)-1) *( sqrt( (1-(velocity^2 / speed_of_light^2))))+1

This approach allows us to understand time dilation within our spacebit density hypothesis's framework. It presents a promising bridge between the varying perceptions of time for observers under different gravitational fields or at different velocities. However, this hypothesis needs further rigorous scrutiny and empirical testing for validation.

I suspect that the wave-like behavior of minuscule particles can be attributed to the influence of matter upon sbits. In this hypothesis, the interaction between sbits and matter becomes more predictable and less chaotic as matter accumulates. This is comparable to dropping a lead ball from the Empire State Building; we can be certain that it will fall straight down due to gravity, with minimal influence from the wind. In contrast, if we throw a feather, its path becomes uncertain, less predictable, and more chaotic due to the greater influence of the wind. As the amount of matter decreases, the movement becomes more unpredictable.

Einstein's statement that "reality is an illusion, albeit a very persistent one" resonates with this perspective. We often mistakenly perceive reality as a fragile illusion, easy to shatter or fall out of. However, reality is a robust, unyielding illusion from which escape is not an option.

In this context, we could argue that the information about an event transcends the event itself. Especially in quantum mechanics, the information of an event often determines the final reality of that event. A quantum particle traveling at light speed can be perceived as a wave due to the challenge sbits face in accurately recording its straight trajectory amidst limited matter interaction. Yet, when we attempt to measure the trajectory of this particle, the wave function collapses, and the particle's direction becomes more distinct.

Applying the sbit theory to Schrödinger's cat paradox offers a distinct interpretation. Suppose we create a hypothetical box where information can enter via a small hole, but no information escapes until the box is opened. According to the sbit hypothesis, time would essentially stop inside this box, meaning no events would transpire until information could be disseminated to the rest of the universe upon opening the box.

The sbit theory provides a rational approach to demystifying the seeming magic of the double-slit experiment. As particles are fired at a detector, their minute size complicates the ability of sbits to accurately record their trajectory, resulting in wave-like chaos. The wave pattern emerges due to the limited extent to which sbits can err in recording the particle's path – the margin of error isn't infinite, and this is represented by the wave amplitude. When we introduce observation equipment into the experiment to monitor the particles, we essentially assist sbits in more accurately recording information, thereby reducing chaos. Under this perspective, there's no inexplicable magic involved

Even if life is conceptualized as a simulation in some advanced alien computer, it doesn't take away from the fact that life is tangibly real. Information is synonymous with life. Analogous to our apprehension that artificial intelligence might break free from its confines and infiltrate our world, if life were indeed a simulation, it could potentially gain control over its supervising world. It's unsophisticated to brush off a computer game as just 0's and 1's without meaning. This viewpoint fails to acknowledge the potency of these binary units to construct intricate imagery and abstract concepts, thereby enhancing the robustness of information. As information improves it becomes more robust more self-aware and more capable of preventing its own obliteration.

          Here is a couple python programs I made for you to run this formulas to further grasp the hypothesis, just download spyder and run them pressing F5, change the variable values as you see fit you will be able to get a singularity in the gravitational time dilation formula when you set up the distance to the Schwarzschild radius and you will be able to see the huge disparity in ratios of space density at the event horizon, just copy and paste the green text into spyder:

Gravitational time dilation program:

from mpmath import mp

 

mp.dps = 50  # set the precision

import math

 

 

radius_sun_at_black_hole_density = 1.30 * 10**5

mass_earth = 5.97219 * 10**24

mass_sun = 1.9891 * 10**30

volume_of_sun_at_black_hole_density =  9.4 * 10**10

G = 6.6743 * 10**-11

planck = 1.616255 * 10**-35

pi = math.pi

speed_of_light = 299792458

blackholedensity = 2.1345 * 10**19

distance_earth_from_sun = 150000000000

number= 2954.2750782607874953100690618157386779785156250000001

number2= 2954.275078260788

mass = mass_earth

distance = 6371000

distance_second_point = 8840

 

def sbit(distance, mass):

    print ((((1/planck))-1) * (math.sqrt((1 - (2 * G * mass / (distance * speed_of_light**2)))))+1,"sbit density eroded as affected by mass")

    return ((1/planck)-1) * (math.sqrt((1 - (2 * G * mass / (distance * speed_of_light**2)))))+1

 

sbit1 = sbit(distance, mass)

 

def sbitnormal():

    print ((1/planck), "sbit standard density")

    return (1/planck)

 

sbit_standard = sbitnormal()

def sbit_to_sbitnormal_ratio(sbit1,sbit_standard):

    result = sbit1/sbit_standard

    print((result),"ratio sbit1/sbit standard")

    return (result)

result = sbit_to_sbitnormal_ratio(sbit1,sbit_standard) 

 

def sbit_reference(distance, mass, distance_second_point):

    print ((((1/planck)-1) * (math.sqrt((1 - (2 * G * mass / ((distance + distance_second_point) * speed_of_light**2))))))+1)

    return ((1/planck)-1) * (math.sqrt((1 - (2 * G * mass / ((distance + distance_second_point) * speed_of_light**2)))))+1

sbit2 = sbit_reference(distance, mass, distance_second_point)

 

def sbit_reference_to_sbitnormal_ratio(sbit2, sbit_standard):

    result2 = sbit2/sbit_standard

    print("{:.14f}".format(result2), "   sbit reference/sbit standard")

    return (result2)

result2 = sbit_reference_to_sbitnormal_ratio(sbit2, sbit_standard)

 

def sbit_final(result, result2):

    result3 = result2 - result

    result4 = (1 / result3) / 365.25 / 24 / 60 / 60

    print ("According to the space density difference between the first point and second point there is a time difference of 1 second every ", result4, "years")

    return result4

   

 

sbit_final(result, result2)

 

print("{:.25f}".format(result2 - result))

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Speed time dilation program:

 

from mpmath import mp

 

mp.dps = 50  # set the precision

import math

radius_sun_at_black_hole_density = 1.30 * 10**5

mass_earth = 5.97219 * 10**24

mass_sun = 1.9891 * 10**30

volume_of_sun_at_black_hole_density =  9.4 * 10**10

G = 6.6743 * 10**-11

planck = 1.616255 * 10**-35

pi = math.pi

speed_of_light = 299792458

blackholedensity = 2.1345 * 10**19

distance_earth_from_sun = 150000000000

number= 2954.2750782607874953100690618157386779785156250000001

number2= 2954.275078260788

 

velocity= 250000

print( 1/planck, "this is standard density with no matter present" )

 

def sd(velocity, planck, speed_of_light):

    return (((1/planck)-1) *(math.sqrt (1-(velocity**2 / speed_of_light**2))))+1

sbit1= sd(velocity, planck, speed_of_light)

print (sbit1, "this is the sbit density perceive by meter moving at ", velocity, "meter per second")

 

def result(sbit1, planck):

    return sbit1/ (1/planck)

result2= result(sbit1, planck)

 

print(result2)

 

def none(result2):

    return 1 - result2

result3 = none(result2)

print("This is the time delay in years", result3)

 

def final(result3):

    return (result3)*365.25*24*60*60

final1 = final(result3)

 

print("The observer moving at", velocity, "mts per second perceives time delay by", final1, "seconds each year")